On Friday 24 June 2005 00:59, jmerkey wrote:
Jan Beulich wrote:
1. No back traceIt's a GBD replacement and is not fully open source.What is not open source in it ()?
KDB is at present more capable. It has a lot of promise, but it does notWhile I never used or saw kdb, I'd be curious about what you immediately
have the all the architectural
features necessary to replace either KDB or GDB at present.
saw missing...
2. Doesn't run standalone fully embeded in the kernel
3. Not fully open source (since it's not embeded in the kernel)
4. IA64 doesn't really matter, since IA64 is basically dead anyway
5. No advanced recursive descent parser for conditional breakpoints
This is more or less completely inaccurate.
-chris