Re: -mm -> 2.6.13 merge status

[Pekka Enberg]

Hi,

On Thu, 2005-06-23 at 21:32 +0200, Jens Axboe wrote:
> then it's impossible to know which one it is without the identical
> source at hand.

In which case, debugging is risky IMO (the source code could have
changed a lot).

On Thu, 2005-06-23 at 21:32 +0200, Jens Axboe wrote:
> That said, I don't like the reiser name-number style. If you must do
> something like this, mark responsibility by using a named identifier
> covering the layer in question instead.
> 
>         assert("trace_hash-89", is_hashed(foo) != 0);

A human readable message would be nicer. For example, "foo was hashed".

		Pekka

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/