[bugzilla-daemon@gentoo.org: [Bug 93671] mount uses wrong default umask for fat filesystem]

From: Karel Kulhavy
Date: Mon Jun 27 2005 - 05:11:26 EST


----- Forwarded message from bugzilla-daemon@xxxxxxxxxx -----

Date: Sun, 26 Jun 2005 23:36:36 +0000
From: bugzilla-daemon@xxxxxxxxxx
To: clock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [Bug 93671] mount uses wrong default umask for fat filesystem

Clear-Text: http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=93671
Secure: https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=93671


stian@xxxxxxxx changed:

What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |stian@xxxxxxxx




------- Additional Comments From stian@xxxxxxxx 2005-06-26 16:36 PDT -------
This is not a mount bug, but a kernel-bug. umask=nnn is passed along other
user-flags to the mount syscall as a string, and the kernel-filesystem driver
parses the string and denies the syscall if a syntax-error occures. Not all
filesystems supports umask, so umask is not sent unless spesified. If the mount
man-page claims that umask is defaulted to the current shell umask setting, the
kernel-driver needs to take this into account when umask isn't found in the
string it receives from user-space. Just my 5 cent about this bug

--
Configure bugmail: http://bugs.gentoo.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You reported the bug, or are watching the reporter.

----- End forwarded message -----
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/