Re: pcmcia: release_class patch concern

[Dominik Brodowski]

Hi Dmitry,

On Mon, Jun 27, 2005 at 11:56:49PM -0500, Dmitry Torokhov wrote:
> Hi Dominik,
> 
> I noticed that Linus committed the patch from you that introduces waiting
> for completion in module's exit routine. I believe it is a big no-no

Is it really? Any PCI driver which calls pci_unregister_driver() waits for
completion (-> driver_unregister() -> wait_for_completion(&drv->unloaded) ).


> as something like this will wedge the kernel:
> 
> 	rmmod <module> < /sys/path/to/devices/attribute

Why would anybody issue such a command? But it even wouldn't succeed, as
the module usage count would be >0 if there are attributes below
/sys/class/pcmcia_socket/

> Have you considered using Greg's class_create()/class_destroy()

Oh, don't get me started... they're for class_device_create() -- and we
don't register char devices here -- and this interface has some severe 
limitations and shortcomings:
http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=linux-usb-devel&m=111193575527911&w=2
and follow the thread...

> or maybe
> bumping up module's refrerence count when registering class devices so
> rmmod would fail if there are users of this module?

In fact, this is done already, even though indirectly: socket drivers will
always increase the reference count as they use exports from pcmcia_core.ko,
and their call to pcmcia_unregister_socket in the device's ->remove()
function only succeeds if the class device is actually freed. So I could
have left the other wait_for_completion out, as it should never actually
_wait_. Nonethteless, I consider it to be a safeguard.

Thanks,
	Dominik
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/