Re: reiser4 plugins

From: Kyle Moffett
Date: Tue Jun 28 2005 - 15:16:21 EST


On Jun 28, 2005, at 15:32:56, David Masover wrote:
Hubert Chan wrote:
On Tue, 28 Jun 2005 02:01:12 -0400, Kyle Moffett <mrmacman_g4@xxxxxxx> said:
I don't disagree with the thumbnail/icon/description, but things like
POSIX acls and extended attributes have _existing_ interfaces which
should be used.

Any existing interface should be supported, but Reiser4 seems to want to
replace all existing interfaces except a direct open() and a proposed
new system call which opens lots of small files at once, efficiently.

The two approaches are not mutually exclusive, though.

I don't think most kernel developers are likely to favor an approach
which smashes a bunch of unrelated data together. Linux syscall
overhead is incredibly low, so I don't see it being much of a problem.
On the other hand, a simple syscall which smashes together a bunch of
related data would not be that big of an issue either. Let's wait for
Namesys to tinker and come back with a new patch before commenting
further.

Cheers,
Kyle Moffett

--
Somone asked me why I work on this free (http://www.fsf.org/philosophy/)
software stuff and not get a real job. Charles Shultz had the best answer:

"Why do musicians compose symphonies and poets write poems? They do it
because life wouldn't have any meaning for them if they didn't. That's why
I draw cartoons. It's my life."
-- Charles Shultz

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/