Re: [PATCH 2/3] freevxfs: minor cleanups

[Matthias Urlichs]

Hi, Pekka Enberg wrote:

> The rationale for this is that since NULL is not guaranteed to be zero
> by the C standard

... as opposed to the other 632719 places in the kernel source where
we do the exact same thing?

If Linux ever gets ported to an architecture where NULL is not
all-bits-zero, the resulting patch will be so damn huge that the
cleanliness-or-not of freevxfs will be the *least* of our worries.

-- 
Matthias Urlichs   |   {M:U} IT Design @ m-u-it.de   |  smurf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Disclaimer: The quote was selected randomly. Really. | http://smurf.noris.de
 - -
You'd best be snoozin', 'cause you don't be gettin' no work done at 5 a.m.
anyway.
		-- From the wall of the Wurster Hall stairwell


-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/