Re: kmalloc without GFP_xxx?

From: Jörn Engel
Date: Wed Jun 29 2005 - 09:26:40 EST


On Wed, 29 June 2005 17:14:32 +0300, Denis Vlasenko wrote:
>
> This is why I always use _irqsave. Less error prone.
> And locking is a very easy to get 'slightly' wrong, thus
> I trade 0.1% of performance for code simplicity.

But sometimes you get lucky and trade 100ms latency for code
simplicity. Of course, the audio people don't mind anymore, now that
we have all sorts of realtime patches. Everyone's happy!

Jörn

--
He that composes himself is wiser than he that composes a book.
-- B. Franklin
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/