Re: kmalloc without GFP_xxx?

[Steven Rostedt]

On Wed, 29 Jun 2005, Jörn Engel wrote:

> Ok, before even more people get confused - I was joking.  Simple code
> is obviously a good thing to have.  Not thinking about code, well...

Your first part seemed half joking and half serious, so I responded with a
more serious answer, just to make sure that others don't think  I write
code like this:

spin_lock_irqsave(lock1,flags1);
spin_lock_irqsave(lock2,flags2);
spin_lock_irqsave(lock3,flags3);

Which would just be really silly!  But you never know ;-)


>
> ... but it appears as if you got the joke.
>

What do you mean?  My professor has shown me the light and LinuxSmallTalk
is the future.

-- Steve

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/