Re: [PATCH] deinline sleep/delay functions

[Maciej W. Rozycki]

On Thu, 30 Jun 2005, Denis Vlasenko wrote:

> I'm ok with making it fail, but _predictably_. With printk(),
> trace, whatever.

 BUG_ON() is probably a good candidate, especially as the implementation 
is expected to be compact and can even be removed for those saving every 
byte by undefining CONFIG_BUG.

  Maciej
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/