Re: [PATCH] eventpoll : Suppress a short lived lock from struct file

[Eric Dumazet]

Peter Zijlstra a écrit :
> On Mon, 2005-07-11 at 09:18 +0200, Eric Dumazet wrote:
>
> Have you tested the impact of this change on big SMP/NUMA machines?
> I hate to see an Altrix crashing to its knees :-)

I tested on a small NUMA machine (2 nodes), with a epoll enabled application,
that use around 100 epoll ctl per second.

Of course, one may write a special benchmark on a BIG SMP/NUMA machine that
 defeat these patch, using thousands of epoll ctl per second, but, a normal (well written ?)
epoll application doesnt constantly add/remove epoll ctl.

Should we waste 8 bytes per 'struct file' for a very unlikely micro benchmark ?

Eric

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/