Re: Merging relayfs?

[Karim Yaghmour]

Tomasz KÅoczko wrote:
> *NOT using realyfs* if it is not neccessary for possibly big amout 
> of feactures future KProbes IMO in this case is *fundamental*.
> 
> To time where this base not requiring relayfs feactures will not be
> integrated in kernel code better IMO will be stop merging relayfs.

This part of the thread is really veering off-topic. This counters thing is
your own personal crusade and has nothing to do with the fundamental need
for a generic buffering mechanism such as relayfs.

I would suggest you start a separate thread to discuss the implementation of
a generic counters mechanism, if that's indeed what you're interested in.

Karim
-- 
Author, Speaker, Developer, Consultant
Pushing Embedded and Real-Time Linux Systems Beyond the Limits
http://www.opersys.com || karim@xxxxxxxxxxx || 1-866-677-4546
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/