Vinay Venkataraghavan wrote:
I know how to implement buffer overflow attacks. ButBuffer overflow attacks vary, but have one thing in common. The
how would an intrusion detection system detect a
buffer overflow attack.
overflow string is much longer than what's usual for the app/protocol in
question. It may also contain illegal characters, but be careful -
non-english users use plenty of valid non-ascii characters in filenames,
passwords and so on.
The way to do this is to implement a transparent proxy module for every
protocol you want to do overflow prevention for. Collect the strings
transmitted, pass them on after validating them. Or reset the
connection when one gets "too long". For example, you may want to
limit POP usernames to whatever the maximum username length is
on your system. But make such things configurable, others may
want longer usernames than you.
My question is at the layerIt can't know of course, but it can suspect that 1000-character
that the intrusion detection system operates, how will
it know that a particular string for exmaple is liable
to overflow a vulnerable buffer.
usernames, passwords or filenames is foul play and reset the
connection. Or 10k URL's . . .
Helge Hafting
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
.