On Thu, 2005-07-14 at 15:36 +0530, RVK wrote:Do you want to say for both 2.6.x and 2.4.x I should interpret that way ?
bits/pthreadtypes.h:150:typedef unsigned long int pthread_t;
That's an implementation detail which you cannot determine any
information from.
What Arjan is saying is that pthread_t is a cookie -- this means that
you cannot interpret it in any way, it is just a "thing" which you can
pass back to the API, that pthread_t happens to be typedef'd to unsigned
long int is irrelevant.
Ian.
--
Ian Campbell
Current Noise: Nile - Annihilation Of The Wicked
Don't tell me what you dreamed last night for I've been reading Freud.
.