Re: [PATCH] i386: Selectable Frequency of the Timer Interrupt

[Zwane Mwaikambo]

On Fri, 15 Jul 2005, Lee Revell wrote:

> On Fri, 2005-07-15 at 14:08 +1000, Con Kolivas wrote:
> > Audio did show slightly larger max latencies but nothing that would be of 
> > significance.
> > 
> > On video, maximum latencies are only slightly larger at HZ 250, all the 
> > desired cpu was achieved, but the average latency and number of missed 
> > deadlines was significantly higher.
> 
> Because audio timing is driven by the soundcard interrupt while video,
> like MIDI, relies heavily on timers.

In interbench it's not driven by a soundcard interrupt.

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/