Re: [PATCH] x86_64: print processor number in show_regs

[Zwane Mwaikambo]

On Fri, 15 Jul 2005, Zwane Mwaikambo wrote:

> Up to date i've been using the GS value to determine the processor number 
> in dumps from show_regs, however this can be cumbersome to do if you don't 
> have the vmlinux to verify with the address of cpu_pda, how about the 
> following? I considered using hard_smp_processor_id for robustness but we 
> already dereference current so we're already relying on MSR_GS_BASE being 
> sane.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Zwane Mwaikambo <zwane@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

Sorry, i sent off an older patch, here is the correct one;

Index: linux-2.6.13-rc2-mm1/arch/x86_64/kernel/process.c
===================================================================
RCS file: /home/cvsroot/linux-2.6.13-rc2-mm1/arch/x86_64/kernel/process.c,v
retrieving revision 1.1.1.1
diff -u -p -B -r1.1.1.1 process.c
--- linux-2.6.13-rc2-mm1/arch/x86_64/kernel/process.c	10 Jul 2005 04:38:46 -0000	1.1.1.1
+++ linux-2.6.13-rc2-mm1/arch/x86_64/kernel/process.c	15 Jul 2005 11:00:28 -0000
@@ -311,6 +311,7 @@ void __show_regs(struct pt_regs * regs)
 
 void show_regs(struct pt_regs *regs)
 {
+	printk("CPU %d:", smp_processor_id());
 	__show_regs(regs);
 	show_trace(&regs->rsp);
 }
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/