Re: RT and XFS

[Daniel Walker]

On Fri, 2005-07-15 at 12:23 +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> * Daniel Walker <dwalker@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> 
> > PI is always good, cause it allows the tracking of what is high 
> > priority , and what is not .
> 
> that's just plain wrong. PI might be good if one cares about priorities 
> and worst-case latencies, but most of the time the kernel is plain good 
> enough and we dont care. PI can also be pretty expensive. So in no way, 
> shape or form can PI be "always good".

I don't agree with that. But of course I'm always speaking from a real
time perspective . PI is expensive , but it won't always be. However, no
one is forcing PI on anyone, even if I think it's good ..

Daniel

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/