Re: supposed to be shared subtree patches.

[Ram Pai]

On Mon, 2005-07-25 at 15:44, Ram Pai wrote:
> , miklos@xxxxxxxxxx, Janak Desai <janak@xxxxxxxxxx>, linux-fsdevel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: [PATCH 0/7] shared subtree
> 
> Hi Andrew/Al Viro,
> 
> 	Enclosing a final set of well tested patches that implement

....my apologies. I screwed up sending the patches through quilt.

anyway I have received the following comments from Andrew Morton, which
I will incorporate before sending out saner looking patches.
sorry again,
RP

Andrew's comments follows:
----------------------------------------

Frankly, I don't even know what these patches _do_, and haven't spent
the time to try to find out.

If these patches are merged, how do we expect end-users to find out how
to use the new capabilities?

A few paragraphs in the patch #1 changelog would help.  A high-level
description of the new capability which explains what it does and why it
would be a useful thing for Linux.

And maybe some deeper information in a Documentation/ file.

Right now, there might well be a lot of people who could use these new
features, but they don't even know that these patches provide them! 
It's all a bit of a mystery, really.
---------------------------------------------------------------------


-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/