Re: Delete scheduler SD_WAKE_AFFINE and SD_WAKE_BALANCE flags
From: Nick Piggin
Date: Fri Jul 29 2005 - 04:00:42 EST
Ingo Molnar wrote:
* Nick Piggin <nickpiggin@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
processes 1 2 3 4
2.6.13-rc4: 187, 183, 179 260, 259, 256 340, 320, 349 504, 496, 500
no wake-bal: 180, 180, 177 254, 254, 253 268, 270, 348 345, 290, 500
Numbers are MB/s, higher is better.
what type of network was used - localhost or a real one?
Localhost. Yeah it isn't a real world test, but it does show the
erratic behaviour without wake affine.
I don't have a setup with multiple fast network adapters otherwise
I would have run a similar test using a real network.
Send instant messages to your online friends http://au.messenger.yahoo.com
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/