Re: Soft lockup in e100 driver ?

[Stephen D. Williams]

"noapic" didn't work, nor did "noacpi", etc.
Going to 2.6.13-rc6.2 solved the problem (once I integrated udev, etc.).

The chipset is an Intel 8x0 something.  Unfortunately, there is a 
heatsink semi-permanently installed over everything.  Is there a /proc 
pseudofile that will give me good identifying chipset info to report here?

If there is a FAQ for this, we should post a message about it once in a 
while.
Nothing here indicates chipset:
http://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/docs/lkml/reporting-bugs.html

The CPU is an Intel Celeron CPU 2.00GHz running at 1495.772 MHz, 128MB 
cache.

sdw

Matti Aarnio wrote:

> On Wed, Aug 10, 2005 at 08:32:45PM -0400, Stephen D. Williams wrote:
>  
>
> > I just noticed that the Ubuntu setup says "GSI 20(level,low) -> IRQ 20" 
> > whereas I remember my built kernels saying "No GSI......  IRQ 11".  I'll 
> > investigate what that means and how to enable it.  Pointers appreciated.
> >    
>
> That is most likely unrelated, but I had similar experiences
> at times.  It turned out that something done recently in APIC
> management code did break things, but lattest version is again
> working.   For a while to have network card working I had to boot
> with  "noapic"  option in my home SMP box.
>
> In an UP box it is about same to boot as "noapic", but in SMP it
> does result in "one CPU does all interrupts" thingie.  (In some
> rare cases it could be desirable, even.)
>
>   /Matti Aarnio
>
>
>  
>
> > sdw
> >
> > Stephen D. Williams wrote:
> >
> >    
> >
> > > I have been working for days to get a recent kernel to work with these 
> > > small-format UP Celeron 2Ghz (running at 1.33Ghz) motherboards that I 
> > > am planning to use as thin clients.  I'm doing a PXE boot, loading 
> > > kernels, and trying to get networking to come up.
> > >
> > > I eventually realized that the problem is that the e100 driver loads 
> > > but does not allow any packet traffic.  The system isn't crashed, but 
> > > I do get transmit timeouts.
> > >
> > > I've used kernels: 2.6.10, 2.6.11, and 2.6.12.4, stock with only the 
> > > "squashfs" patch applied and compiled as 586/....
> > >
> > > The interesting thing is that Ubuntu 5.04, booted "Live" on the box, 
> > > works just fine with the e100 driver with a kernel shown as: 
> > > "2.6.10-5-386".  I'm going to work on pulling this kernel and its 
> > > modules off to use.
> > >
> > > Any help urgently appreciated.
> > >
> > > sdw
> > >      
>
>  

begin:vcard
fn:Stephen Williams
n:Williams;Stephen
email;internet:sdw@xxxxxxx
tel;work:703-724-0118
tel;fax:703-995-0407
tel;pager:sdwpage@xxxxxxx
tel;home:703-729-5405
tel;cell:703-371-9362
x-mozilla-html:TRUE
version:2.1
end:vcard