On Mon, 2005-08-15 at 18:13, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:I couldn't find any documentation on how the ACPI interfaces work, so I'm kind of in the dark.
On Friday 12 August 2005 1:44 pm, Peter Martuccelli wrote:Adding in Corey to the discussion regarding ipmi_si initialization,
Stumbled into this problem working on the ipmi_si driver. When theI don't know whether the ACPI patch is correct or desirable, but
ipmi_si driver initialization fails the acpi_tb_get_table call, after rsdt_info has been allocated, acpi_get_firmware_table()
will oops trying to reference off rsdt_info->pointer in the cleanup
code.
I think the ipmi_si ACPI discovery is bogus (it was probably
written before the current ACPI and PNPACPI driver registration
interfaces were stable).
Currently, ipmi_si uses the static SPMI table to locate the
device. But the static table should only be used if we need
the device very early, before the ACPI namespace is available.
I don't think we use the device early, so we should use
pnp_register_driver() to claim the appropriate PNP IDs.
Or we might have to use acpi_bus_register_driver() since
it looks like it uses ACPI-specific features like GPEs.
waiting on Len to decide on the ACPI fix.