Re: [PATCH] i386 !NUMA node_to_cpumask broken in early boot

[Andi Kleen]

> Thanks for the feedback, ugly indeed, i was really trying to avoid adding 
> a new API function or extra cpu_* variables. Ok, here is an 
> early_node_to_cpumask instead.

Thinking about it again it's most likely broken with CPU hotplug anyways
whatever you're doing. So how does your code handle adding new 
CPUs?  If it does can the normal CPU bootup be handled in the 
same way. Then this wouldn't be needed at all.

-Andi
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/