second_overflow

From: smiling_23
Date: Fri Aug 19 2005 - 06:13:10 EST

Next message: Alexander Fieroch: "Re: PROBLEM: "drive appears confused" and "irq 18: nobody cared!""
Previous message: Ingo Oeser: "Re: Multiple virtual address mapping for the same code on IA-64 linux kernel."
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

Hi,
I am trying to understand the timer adjustment calculation in Linuxkernel 2.6.12.5.
How the time_adj is going to effect the change in HZ.
For example if i modified the HZ to 2000. Then what will hapen to the time_adj. is there any separate
calculation of time_adj is required for HZ 2000.
Thanks.
Cjag

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: Alexander Fieroch: "Re: PROBLEM: "drive appears confused" and "irq 18: nobody cared!""
Previous message: Ingo Oeser: "Re: Multiple virtual address mapping for the same code on IA-64 linux kernel."
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]