Re: sched_yield() makes OpenLDAP slow

[Nikita Danilov]

Howard Chu writes:
 > Nikita Danilov wrote:
 > > That returns us to the core of the problem: sched_yield() is used to
 > > implement a synchronization primitive and non-portable assumptions are
 > > made about its behavior: SUS defines that after sched_yield() thread
 > > ceases to run on the CPU "until it again becomes the head of its thread
 > > list", and "thread list" discipline is only defined for real-time
 > > scheduling policies. E.g., 
 > >
 > > int sched_yield(void)
 > > {
 > >        return 0;
 > > }
 > >
 > > and
 > >
 > > int sched_yield(void)
 > > {
 > >        sleep(100);
 > >        return 0;
 > > }
 > >
 > > are both valid sched_yield() implementation for non-rt (SCHED_OTHER)
 > > threads.
 > I think you're mistaken:
 > http://groups.google.com/group/comp.programming.threads/browse_frm/thread/0d4eaf3703131e86/da051ebe58976b00#da051ebe58976b00
 > 
 > sched_yield() is required to be supported even if priority scheduling is 
 > not supported, and it is required to cause the calling thread (not 
 > process) to yield the processor.

Of course sched_yield() is required to be supported, the question is for
how long CPU is yielded. Here is the quote from the SUS (actually the
complete definition of sched_yield()):

    The sched_yield() function shall force the running thread to
    relinquish the processor until it again becomes the head of its
    thread list.

As far as I can see, SUS doesn't specify how "thread list" is maintained
for non-RT scheduling policy, and implementation that immediately places
SCHED_OTHER thread that called sched_yield() back at the head of its
thread list is perfectly valid. Also valid is an implementation that
waits for 100 seconds and then places sched_yield() caller to the head
of the list, etc. Basically, while semantics of sched_yield() are well
defined for RT scheduling policy, for SCHED_OTHER policy standard leaves
it implementation defined.

 > 
 > -- 
 >   -- Howard Chu

Nikita.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/