Re: [PATCH 0/2] external interrupts

[Brent Casavant]

On Mon, 22 Aug 2005, Andrew Morton wrote:

> Having an abstraction layer for a single client driver does seem a bit
> pointless.  It would become more pointful if other client drivers were to
> pop up.
>
> Hence an option would be to merge an IOC4-specific driver which just does
> what you need, no abstraction layer.  If someone later comes up with a
> requirement for a driver for similar-looking hardware then we can resurrect
> the abstraction layer at that stage.

Agreed.  I'll look into what our plans are for additional or follow-on
devices.  Right now I see a need for this on the horizon, but it's not
much more than a tiny indistiguishable dot.  I'll have more info in a
day or two.  I'll also use that time to fix up the things that
Christoph Hellwig noticed.

Brent

-- 
Brent Casavant                          If you had nothing to fear,
bcasavan@xxxxxxx                        how then could you be brave?
Silicon Graphics, Inc.                    -- Queen Dama, Source Wars
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/