Re: some missing spin_unlocks

[Arjan van de Ven]

> This one needs more care.  We can't drop the lock, because
> the destroy actions need to be protected by that lock, but
> we can't release the lock after rose_destroy_socket() because
> the object may not even exist any longer.


does it matter? can ANYTHING be spinning on the lock? if not .. can we
just let the lock go poof and not unlock it... 

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/