Re: [PATCH 1/2] external interrupts: abstraction layer

[Brent Casavant]

On Wed, 24 Aug 2005, Christoph Hellwig wrote:

> Sorry, the whole behaviour is complety fine.  I just don't thing the name
> and calling convention of file_to_extint_device is optimal.  It should
> take an struct inode * and be called just to_extint_device or someting.
> The above would become
> 
> 	struct extint_device *ed = to_extint_device(filp->f_dentry->d_inode);

OK, no problem, since file_to_extint_device() went away anyway.

Brent

-- 
Brent Casavant                          If you had nothing to fear,
bcasavan@xxxxxxx                        how then could you be brave?
Silicon Graphics, Inc.                    -- Queen Dama, Source Wars
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/