Re: 2.6.12 Performance problems

[Ben Greear]

Danial Thom wrote:

> I think the concensus is that 2.6 has made trade
> offs that lower raw throughput, which is what a
> networking device needs. So as a router or
> network appliance, 2.6 seems less suitable. A raw
> bridging test on a 2.0Ghz operton system:
>
> FreeBSD 4.9: Drops no packets at 900K pps
> Linux 2.4.24: Starts dropping packets at 350K pps
> Linux 2.6.12: Starts dropping packets at 100K pps

I ran some quick tests using kernel 2.6.11, 1ms tick (HZ=1000), SMP kernel.
Hardware is P-IV 3.0Ghz + HT on a new SuperMicro motherboard with 64/133Mhz
PCI-X bus.  NIC is dual Intel pro/1000.  Kernel is close to stock 2.6.11.

I used brctl to create a bridge with the two GigE adapters in it and
used pktgen to stream traffic through it (250kpps in one direction, 1kpps in
the other.)

I see a reasonable amount of drops at 250kpps (60 byte packets):
about 60,000,000 packets received, 20,700 dropped.

Interestingly, the system is about 60% idle according to top,
and still dropping pkts, so it would seem that the system could
be better utilized!

Ben

--
Ben Greear <greearb@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Candela Technologies Inc  http://www.candelatech.com

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/