Re: Promise ATA/133 Errors With 2.6.10+

[Justin Piszcz]

It appears that 2.6.13-rc7 has fixed the bug.
I would like to know *What* changed, but I'll probably never find out :(

On Thu, 28 Jul 2005, Andrew Morton wrote:

> Justin Piszcz <jpiszcz@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > I have two different machines with the 7200.8 Seagate 8MB 400GB drives.
> >
> > Both have ATA/133 controllers, the error is the same on both:
> >
> > Jun 24 15:24:18 localhost kernel: hde: no DRQ after issuing MULTWRITE_EXT
> >
> > I put the drive on an (older) Promise ATA/100 controller = works great!
> > I put the drive on the second box on the motherboard IDE interface = works
> > great!
> >
> > What happened > 2.6.10 to the promise driver?
> >
> > ??
> >
> > Jun 24 15:24:18 localhost kernel: PDC202XX: Primary channel reset.
> > Jun 24 15:24:18 localhost kernel: hde: timeout waiting for DMA
> > Jun 24 15:24:18 localhost kernel: hde: status error: status=0x58 {
> > DriveReady SeekComplete DataRequest }
> > Jun 24 15:24:18 localhost kernel:
> > Jun 24 15:24:18 localhost kernel: ide: failed opcode was: unknown
> > Jun 24 15:24:18 localhost kernel: hde: drive not ready for command
> > Jun 24 15:24:18 localhost kernel: hde: status timeout: status=0xd0 { Busy
> > }
> > Jun 24 15:24:18 localhost kernel:
> > Jun 24 15:24:18 localhost kernel: ide: failed opcode was: unknown
> > Jun 24 15:24:18 localhost kernel: PDC202XX: Primary channel reset.
> > Jun 24 15:24:18 localhost kernel: hde: no DRQ after issuing MULTWRITE_EXT
> > Jun 24 15:24:18 localhost kernel: ide2: reset: success
>
> Is this still happening in 2.6.13-rc4?
>
> If so, can you please cc linux-kernel on the reply?  Thanks.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/