Re: Dynamic tick for 2.6.14 - what's the plan?

From: Alistair John Strachan
Date: Tue Aug 30 2005 - 10:57:56 EST


On Tuesday 30 August 2005 13:31, Tony Lindgren wrote:
[snip]
> >
> > Same issue, it's waiting on dynticks before being reworked.
>
> Also one more minor issue; Dyntick can cause slow boots with dyntick
> enabled from boot because the there's not much in the timer queue
> until init.
>
> This probably does not show up much on x86 though because of the
> short hardware timers.

You could disable it until jiffies >= 0; this covers the boot criteria and
still allows for moderate savings post boot (though maybe on embedded systems
the delay is too long?).

--
Cheers,
Alistair.

'No sense being pessimistic, it probably wouldn't work anyway.'
Third year Computer Science undergraduate.
1F2 55 South Clerk Street, Edinburgh, UK.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/