Re: [PATCH] PREEMPT_RT vermagic

[Tom Rini]

On Wed, Aug 31, 2005 at 07:29:44AM -0700, Tom Rini wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 31, 2005 at 09:20:17AM +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> > 
> > * Daniel Walker <dwalker@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > 
> > > Ingo,
> > > 	This patch adds a vermagic hook so PREEMPT_RT modules can be
> > > distinguished from PREEMPT_DESKTOP modules.
> > 
> > vermagic is very crude and there are zillions of other details and 
> > .config flags that might make a module incompatible. You can use 
> > CONFIG_MODVERSIONS to get a stronger protection that vermagic, but 
> > that's far from perfect too. The right solution is the module signing 
> > framework in Fedora. Until that gets merged upstream just dont mix 
> > incompatible modules, and keep things tightly packaged.
> 
> MODVERSIONS won't get the PREEMPT_RT vs PREEMPT_DESKTOP case right
> without this, unless I'm missing something.

I'm missing something I see.

-- 
Tom Rini
http://gate.crashing.org/~trini/
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/