Re: "stable" vs "security stable"

[Valdis . Kletnieks]

On Sun, 09 Oct 2005 15:44:38 +0800, Coywolf Qi Hunt said:
> On 10/9/05, Valdis.Kletnieks@xxxxxx <Valdis.Kletnieks@xxxxxx> wrote:

> It is "security stable". Let's take this new notation from now on.
> "Security Stable" doesn't have to be all security related.

Tell you what - you convince the -stable team, and I'll go along with it..

> (you want stable@xxxxxxxxxx to replace security@xxxxxxxxxx too?)

You're the one who called it "security stable" ;)

> What you did is so stupid to me to to use -R every time. -R implies
> something wrong, and need to revert.

Umm... my diff had *lower case* -r (recursive), not -R (revert)...

Attachment: pgp00000.pgp
Description: PGP signature