Re: [PATCH] x86-64: Fix bad assumption that dualcore cpus have syncedTSCs

[Jonas Oreland]

Hi,

check http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5283

/Jonas

Vladimir B. Savkin wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 10, 2005 at 11:03:24AM -0700, john stultz wrote:
> 
>>>From your dmesg, it appears that there are no other timesources other
>>then the TSC available on your hardware. So I'm guessing idle=poll is
>>keeping the CPUs from halting the TSC and keeping them synched. 
>>
>>
>>I would think that the ACPI PM timer would be supported, but I don't see
>>anything about it in your dmesg. Could you make sure it is properly
>>configured in?
> 
> 
> Yes, I tried different combinations of PM_TIMER and HPET options.
> In this try, PM_TIMER was definetly enabled in kernel config.
> 
> What kind of kernel message did you expect from workibf PM timer?
> 
> ~
> :wq
>                                         With best regards, 
>                                            Vladimir Savkin. 
> 
> -
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/