Re: [RFC patch 2/3] remove pci_driver.owner and .name fields

[Roland Dreier]

    > It looks stupid in the first place - what's wrong with
    > 		.driver.name = "DAC960",
    > instead of that mess?

Unfortunately I don't think gcc 2.95 accepts that syntax.  For
example the following:

	void foo(void)
	{
		struct {
			struct {
				int y;
			} x;
		} bar = {
			.x.y = 1
		};
	}

gives

	a.c: In function `foo':
	a.c:8: unknown field `y' specified in initializer

when compiled with gcc 2.95.

I guess we could do

	.driver = { .name = "DAC960" },

but that seems silly as well.

 - R.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/