BUG?: request_irq can apparently sleep
From: Christian Ehrhardt
Date: Mon Oct 31 2005 - 05:41:37 EST
Hi,
the basic question is: Is request_irq allowed to sleep?
A lot of code suggest that sleeping is not allowed, including a
call to kmalloc(..., GFP_ATOMIC) in request_irq itself.
However, we have the following at least theoretically possible call chain:
request_irq->setup_irq->register_handler_proc->proc_mkdir->
->proc_mkdir_mode->proc_create->kmalloc (..., GFP_KERNEL)->BOOM
The code in kernel/fs/proc/generic.c looks like this:
ent = kmalloc(sizeof(struct proc_dir_entry) + len + 1, GFP_KERNEL);
if (!ent) goto out;
Given that check for ent != NULL this should probably be changed to an
GFP_ATOMIC allocation. Am I missing something?
regards Christian
--
THAT'S ALL FOLKS!
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/