Re: initramfs for /dev/console with udev?

[Rob Landley]

On Thursday 03 November 2005 00:47, Robert Schwebel wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 02, 2005 at 09:40:24PM -0600, Rob Landley wrote:
> > > dir /dev 0755 0 0
> > > nod /dev/console 0600 0 0 c 5 1
> > > nod /dev/null 0600 0 0 c 1 3
> > > dir /root 0700 0 0
> > >
> > > and let CONFIG_INITRAMFS_SOURCE point to that file. The gpio archive is
> > > built correctly with that, but my kernel doesn't seem to use it.
> >
> > 1) You have no init in initramfs, so it goes ahead and mounts whatever
> > root= points to over it. I'm guessing that's where it's looking for
> > /dev/console from.
>
> Hmm, I thought something like that. That means that I do need a complete
> klibc based early userspace, just to get these two device nodes?

No, you just need a statically linked init program.  (Which can be a shell 
script using a statically linked shell.  For testing purposes it can be 
statically linked against glibc, it'll just be a bloated pig.)

I have a /tools directory that builds uClibc executables.  (Like Linux From 
Scratch Chapter 5: extract it as /tools, export PATH=/tools/bin:$PATH, and 
then build software as normal.)  I can post that somewhere if you'd like, or 
you can extract it yourself out of my firmware linux build 
(http://www.landley.net/code/firmware)...

The switch_root program in busybox is still being banged on (by me).  I 
haven't quite worked out what to do about /dev/console yet.  I'm thinking if 
it's not there, keep the one from initramfs, but haven't implemented that 
tweak yet...

You also have the option of putting a single static node (console) in the /dev 
directory you're going to overmount.  It shouldn't hurt anything at present.  
And if nothing else, it'll confirm where it's trying to get the sucker 
from...

> Seems 
> like I'll have to do some deeper investigation of klibc; last time I
> looked it didn't even compile for ARCH=um.

Klibc didn't, or the kernel didn't?

> > 2) What's the directory /root for?
>
> Just a relict from the default script; the first three lines should be
> enought. But it shouldn't matter.
>
> > > Is anything else needed to use an initrd, like a command line argument?
> > > My kernel boots from a nfs partition, so it sets nfsroot=...
> >
> > Note that initramfs and initrd and very different things.
>
> Is there any other known possibility to get just these two device nodes
> in an automatic way?

>From initramfs, you could try:

mount -t sysfs /sys /sys
CDEV=`cat /sys/class/tty/console`
mknod /dev/console c $(echo $CDEV | sed 's/:.*//') \
  $(echo $CDEV | sed 's/.*://')

Bit of a chicken and egg problem if it refuses to run /init if it's not 
already there, though.  We're heading towards fully dynamic devices, but not 
quite there yet...

> I'm trying to get rid of devfs, and udev works just 
> fine. The only thing not solved yet is how to get the beast started
> without /dev/console and /dev/null. I don't want to create the nodes
> statically, because that's only possible with root permissions.

You don't need root access to make an initramfs configuration text file. :)

> Some background: I'm building root filesystems for embedded systems with
> PTXdist; the user is able to build the whole thing without root
> permissions; either with a cross compiler and mount it via NFS or build
> a JFFS2 image, or, with one switch, build and run it with an uml kernel.

I did something like that, only from scratch:
http://www.landley.net/code/firmware

I'll probably release version 0.8.10 later today.  (Still need to make an 
installer for the bootable version before I can call it 0.9...)

> I also tried ndevfs, just to get these two nodes, but I didn't find out
> how to automatically mount it on boot yet.

Presumably, either via initramfs or from init/main.c

> Robert

Rob
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/