Re: [PATCH] backup timer for UARTs that lose interrupts (take 2)

[George Anzinger]

Randy.Dunlap wrote:
> On Wed, 16 Nov 2005, George Anzinger wrote:
>
>
> > Could you _please_ not put inline patches after the signature mark ("-- ").  In my mailer (mozilla)
> > this causes the patch to be greyed out and, more importantly, NOT included in a reply.  This, in
> > turn, makes it hard to comment on details in the patch.
>
>
>
> Would it help if Alex used the documented canonical patch format,
> using "---" instead of "-- "?  I sorta doubt it.

I suspect it would.  The "-- \n" is a documented signature mark (took 
me a while to find this out) and I have found no way to make mozilla 
do anything different with it.  I don't have any documentation on 
"---" but it surly is not a signature mark and I suspect most mailers 
will not attach any signifigance to it.


> BTW, George, please hit Return/Enter around column 70+...

Sorry, some how my wrap line length moved up to 100.  Fixed now.

--
George Anzinger   george@xxxxxxxxxx
HRT (High-res-timers):  http://sourceforge.net/projects/high-res-timers/
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/