Re: [RFC] [PATCH 00/13] Introduce task_pid api

[Pavel Machek]

Hi!

> >>@@ -2925,7 +2925,7 @@ void submit_bio(int rw, struct bio *bio)
> >> 	if (unlikely(block_dump)) {
> >> 		char b[BDEVNAME_SIZE];
> >> 		printk(KERN_DEBUG "%s(%d): %s block %Lu on %s\n",
> >>-			current->comm, current->pid,
> >>+			current->comm, task_pid(current),
> >> 			(rw & WRITE) ? "WRITE" : "READ",
> >> 			(unsigned long long)bio->bi_sector,
> >> 			bdevname(bio->bi_bdev,b));
> >
> >...and now printk is close to useless, because uer can't know to  
> >which pidspace that pid belongs. Oops.
> 
> Uhh, this patch doesn't introduce any kind of virtualization yet.    
> When that happens, _this_ code will remain the same (it wants the  
> real pid), but *other* code will switch to use task_vpid(current)  
> instead.  This is an extremely literal translation of current->pid to  
> task_pid(current), both of which do exactly the same thing.

Hmm... it is hard to judge a patch without context. Anyway, can't we
get process snasphot/resume without virtualizing pids? Could we switch
to 128-bits so that pids are never reused or something like that?

								Pavel
-- 
Thanks, Sharp!
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/