Re: [PATCH] libata error handling fixes (ATAPI)

[Jens Axboe]

On Wed, Nov 16 2005, Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz wrote:
> On 11/16/05, Jens Axboe <axboe@xxxxxxx> wrote:
> > On Wed, Nov 16 2005, Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz wrote:
> > > > > which of course didn't work, so it was changed to the above which then
> > > > > broke the assumption of what type of requests we expect to see in
> > > > > ide_softirq_done(). We can't generically handle this case, so it's
> > > > > probably best to just add this logic to __ide_end_request() - it's just
> > > > > another case for _not_ using the blk_complete_request() path, just like
> > > > > the partial case.
> > > >
> > > > Sounds better but I honestly think that you simply cannot obtain
> > > > reliable nr_sectors to complete for FS/PC requests just from the
> > > > request type.  Two examples are: failed disk flush requests and
> > > > cd noretry requests (both are of FS type).
> > >
> > > first example is bad :-)
> >
> > Both your examples are wrong - a flush request is non-fs/pc, and noretry
> > requests doesn't impact the type of the request at from this POV.
> 
> I meant doing partial completions of the real request from the
> ->end_flush() and noretry doesn't impact the type but it does
> impact the nr_sectors to complete.  However none of these
> matters any longer with your latest patch which simplifies things
> a lot.

Ah, partial completions due to hitting an error in the flush. Yeah that
would have broken, you are right. And yes, that should work now, it's
the way it should have been written from the get-go.

-- 
Jens Axboe

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/