Re: [linux-pm] [RFC] userland swsusp
From: Patrick Mochel
Date: Thu Nov 17 2005 - 12:02:48 EST
On Thu, 17 Nov 2005, Greg KH wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 17, 2005 at 05:54:37PM +0100, Olivier Galibert wrote:
> > On Wed, Nov 16, 2005 at 07:10:52PM +0000, Pavel Machek wrote:
> > > What unstable implementation? swsusp had very little regressions over past
> > > year or so. Drivers were different story, but nothing changes w.r.t. drivers.
> > Do you mean swsusp is actually supposed to work? Suspend-to-ram,
> > suspend-to-disk or both?
> Both. -to-ram depends on your video chip, but to-disk should work just
> fine. If not, please report bugs.
swsusp has nothing to do with suspend-to-ram. swsusp is a
platform-independent implementation of suspend-to-disk. STR is
very-platform dependent. Please see the file:
for more info.
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/