Re: nanosleep with small value

From: Dag Nygren
Date: Mon Nov 21 2005 - 02:24:26 EST

> Dag Nygren wrote:
> > But what is the point of having a nanosleep() in that case when you could do
> > just fine with usleep() ?
> I'd suggest looking into the kthrt patches (which incorporates ktimers
> and John Stultz's timeofday patches):

Thanks for that tip. This completely solved my problem; The program works

There seems to be two "competing" patches out there, but this seems to be the
to go as the kernel bunch is behind it.



To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at