Re: [PATCH 4/5] Centralise NO_IRQ definition

[Paul Mackerras]

Ingo Molnar writes:

> is there any architecture where irq 0 is a legitimate setting that could 
> occur in drivers, and which would make NO_IRQ define of 0 non-practical?  

Yes, G5 powermacs have the SATA controller on irq 0.  So if we can't
use irq 0, I can't get to my hard disk. :)  Other powermacs also use
irq 0 for various things, as do embedded PPC machines.

Paul.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/