Re: [patch 1/1] cpufreq_conservative/ondemand: invert meaning of'ignore nice'

From: Andrew Morton
Date: Wed Nov 23 2005 - 04:50:42 EST

Alexander Clouter <alex@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> The use of the 'ignore_nice' sysfs file is confusing to anyone using it. This
> removes the sysfs file 'ignore_nice' and in its place creates a
> 'ignore_nice_load' entry which defaults to '1'; meaning nice'd processes are
> not counted towards the 'business' calculation.

drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_ondemand.c:226: error: 'store_ignore_nice_load' undeclared here (not in a function)

To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at