Re: [RFC][PATCH] Runtime switching of the idle function [take 2]

[john stultz]

On Mon, 2005-11-28 at 22:42 -0500, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> On Mon, 2005-11-28 at 19:02 -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
> > Steven Rostedt <rostedt@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > >
> > > This patch creates a directory in /sys/kernel called idle.
> > >
> > 
> > At no point do you appear to explain _why_ the kernel needs this feature?
> 
> Sorry about that.  This originally came up when we had problems with the
> AMD64 x2 in the -rt patch.  It was noted that the TSCs would get very
> far out of sync and cause problems.  The way to solve this was to set
> idle=poll.  The original patch I sent was to allow the user to change to
> idle=poll dynamically.  This way they could switch to the poll_idle and
> run there tests (requiring tsc not to drift) and then switch back to the
> default idle to save on electricity.

The problem with this is that this must be a one way transition. That
is, once the TSCs have become unsynchronized, there is no use going back
to using the polling idle unless you add some code to re-sync the TSCs
which would be ugly to do after the system has booted.

Using idle=poll (for anything other then debugging) is really a worst
case workaround for systems that do not have alternative clocksources
like ACPI PM or HPET.

Its an interesting bit of code, but I'm not really sure I understand its
usefulness.

thanks
-john



-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/