Re: Use enum to declare errno values

[Bill Davidsen]

Giuliano Pochini wrote:
> On 23-Nov-2005 Denis Vlasenko wrote:
>
> > On Wednesday 23 November 2005 15:24, moreau francis wrote:
> >
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > I'm just wondering why not declaring errno values using enumaration ? It is 
> > > just more convenient when debuging the kernel.
> >
> > Enums are really nice substitute for integer constants instead of #defines.
> > Enums obey scope rules, #defines do not.
> >
> > However enums are not widely used because of
> > 1. tradition and style
> > 2. awkward syntax required:   enum { ABC = 123 };
>
>
> The value of an enum constant must be representable as an int. This
> is not always the case, expecially with hardware constants and bit
> masks, which may require an unsigned int.

Could you provide an example of where the ERRNO is not an integer? It 
doesn't take on bit values, nor can I spot a plcae where the value is so 
large it would overflow if signed.

See errno.h for a starting point. I do think error_t is a good idea, 
although I doubt there's an example of a type mismatch going uncaught 
without it.
--
   -bill davidsen (davidsen@xxxxxxx)
"The secret to procrastination is to put things off until the
 last possible moment - but no longer"  -me

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/