Re: ACPI: PCI Interrupt Link [LNKA] (IRQs *7)

From: JaniD++
Date: Wed Nov 30 2005 - 18:30:38 EST


Hi,


----- Original Message -----
From: "Jan Engelhardt" <jengelh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: "Carlos Martín" <carlosmn@xxxxxxxxx>
Cc: "JaniD++" <djani22@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>; <linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>;
"Denis Vlasenko" <vda@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Wednesday, November 30, 2005 6:35 PM
Subject: Re: ACPI: PCI Interrupt Link [LNKA] (IRQs *7)


> >> > *7)
> >> > Nov 28 16:41:36 192.168.2.50 kernel: ACPI: PCI Interrupt Link [LNKD]
(IRQs
> >> > *7)
> >> > Nov 28 16:41:36 192.168.2.50 kernel: ACPI: PCI Interrupt Link [LNKE]
(IRQs 3
> >> > 4 5 6 7 10 11 12 14 15) *0, disabled.
> >> > Nov 28 16:41:36 192.168.2.50 kernel: ACPI: PCI Interrupt Link [LNKF]
(IRQs 3
> >> > 4 5 6 7 10 11 12 14 15) *0, disabled.
> >> > Nov 28 16:41:36 192.168.2.50 kernel: ACPI: PCI Interrupt Link [LNKG]
(IRQs 3
> >> > 4 5 6 7 10 11 12 14 15) *0, disabled.
> >> > Nov 28 16:41:36 192.168.2.50 kernel: ACPI: PCI Interrupt Link [LNKH]
(IRQs 3
> >> > 4 5 6 7 *10 11 12 14 15)
> >> >
> >> > This is normal? :-)
> >>
> >> I do not understand your question
> >
> >To answer the question, yes, it is perfectly normal to see that.
> >That's just the kernel describing how the PCI IRQs are set up. You
> >have nothing to worry about.
>
> I think it's the "disabled" that worries.

No, i worried about the " (IRQs *7)" format.
I never seen this before....

I searching the bottleneck of my system, and simply found these lines.

I have another question:

CPU0 CPU1 CPU2 CPU3
0: 112 0 0 12095059 IO-APIC-edge timer
8: 0 0 0 2005 IO-APIC-edge rtc
9: 0 0 0 0 IO-APIC-level acpi
14: 0 0 0 1922693 IO-APIC-edge ide0
169: 0 0 0 0 IO-APIC-level
uhci_hcd:usb2
177: 0 0 0 0 IO-APIC-level
uhci_hcd:usb3
185: 0 0 0 0 IO-APIC-level
uhci_hcd:usb4
193: 0 0 0 0 IO-APIC-level
ehci_hcd:usb1
209: 0 0 0 204795144 IO-APIC-level eth0
217: 0 0 0 424538586 IO-APIC-level eth1
NMI: 0 0 0 0
LOC: 12095010 12095009 12094905 12094904
ERR: 0
MIS: 0

How can i avoid this?
(all irq on CPU 3)

The echo /proc/irq/#smp_affinity # >smp_affinity

Has no effect. :-(

I tried it with kernel irq load balancing is on and off.
But nothing is changed. :(

Thanks

Janos



>
>
>
> Jan Engelhardt
> --
> | Alphagate Systems, http://alphagate.hopto.org/
> | jengelh's site, http://jengelh.hopto.org/
> -
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/