RE: [PATCH] Add VT flag to cpuinfo

[Dugger, Donald D]

Andi-

Story of my life (I've had way too many patches that I
sent out just a little too late :-)

No, if you made the same change to the IA32 branch then
that's fine, tnx.

--
Don Dugger
"Censeo Toto nos in Kansa esse decisse." - D. Gale
Donald.D.Dugger@xxxxxxxxx
Ph: (303)440-1368 

>-----Original Message-----
>From: Andi Kleen [mailto:ak@xxxxxxx] 
>Sent: Wednesday, November 30, 2005 4:42 PM
>To: Dugger, Donald D
>Cc: Andi Kleen; linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; Shah, Rajesh; 
>akpm@xxxxxxxx
>Subject: Re: [PATCH] Add VT flag to cpuinfo
>
>On Wed, Nov 30, 2005 at 03:34:19PM -0800, Dugger, Donald D wrote:
>> Andi-
>> 
>> Good guess.  We discuessed it and decided that `vmx' was the best
>> term so I'll rework the patch to use that name.
>> 
>> BTW, I don't see any reference to `vmx' in the 2.6.14 tree, is
>> this a change you recently made to your tree?
>
>2.6.14 is ancient. Check 2.6.15rc* 
>Actually I think I changed 32bit too, so your patch is wholly
>obsolete unless you want to rename it.
>
>-Andi
>
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/