Re: [ckrm-tech] [RFC][Patch 3/5] Per-task delay accounting: Sync block I/O delays

[Shailabh Nagar]

Dave Hansen wrote:
> On Wed, 2005-12-07 at 22:23 +0000, Shailabh Nagar wrote:
> 
>>+       if (-EIOCBQUEUED == ret) {
>>+               __attribute__((unused)) struct timespec start, end;
>>+
> 
> 
> Those "unused" things suck.  They're really ugly.
> 
> Doesn't making your delay functions into static inlines make the unused
> warnings go away?

They do indeed. Thanks !
It was a holdover from when the delay funcs were macros. Will fix everywhere.

--Shailabh


> 
> -- Dave
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/