Re: RFC: ACPI/scsi/libata integration and hotswap

[Matthew Garrett]

On Thu, Dec 08, 2005 at 02:01:38PM +0000, Alan Cox wrote:

> Something like  "pci_to_acpi(struct pcidev *)" belongs in arch specific
> code even if we do add a generic "void * pm_device" type pointer to
> struct pci_dev or struct device for such a purpose.

pci_to_acpi is already implemented in the PCI layer (see 
drivers/pci/pci-acpi.c), with struct device.firmware_data being where 
the acpi_handle ends up. I guess there's no problem in moving my code 
out to scsi-acpi.c and adding an arch_initcall for it. Would that be 
more acceptable? The only problem then is working out a clean way of 
setting up the notification structure.

-- 
Matthew Garrett | mjg59@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/