Re: [PATCH] Fix RCU race in access of nohz_cpu_mask
From: David S. Miller
Date: Sun Dec 11 2005 - 23:37:37 EST
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxx>
Date: Sun, 11 Dec 2005 20:32:26 -0800
> So foo_mb() in preemptible code is potentially buggy.
>
> I guess we assume that a context switch accidentally did enough of the
> right types of barriers for things to work OK.
A trap ought to flush all memory operations.
There are some incredibly difficult memory error handling cases if the
cpu does not synchronize all pending memory operations when a trap
occurs.
Failing that, yes, to be absolutely safe we'd need to have some
explicit memory barrier in the context switch.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/