Re: [2.6 patch] defconfig's shouldn't set CONFIG_BROKEN=y
From: Simon Richter
Date: Tue Dec 13 2005 - 08:33:45 EST
Hi,
Adrian Bunk wrote:
It's a problem introduced by your patch because the resulting defconfig
file becomes _wrong_ by your change, and other changes in the defconfig
are thereby hidden.
...
No, CONFIG_BROKEN=y in a defconfig file is a bug.
Indeed, but that's not the point. A defconfig file should be the result
of running one of the various configuration targets; yours are
hand-patched. If you run the defconfig target, it will copy the config
file and run oldconfig, thus resulting in a different configuration file
(because options may now be gone and hence disabled) than what was in
the defconfig, and thus people may come to the wrong conclusion that if
a driver is enabled in a defconfig file, it will be built.
Simon
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature